Last week I wrote here about the IFPI including a musician in their lawsuit against Pirate Bay that never wanted to, nor was asked about being included. Well that was pretty bad…but in a further nuisance to the case against file sharers, it turns out that one of the expert witnesses brought on behalf of the IFPI as a prosecutor’s witness to help quash Pirate Bay was actually a former employee. Of course, this conflict of interest wasn’t revealed by the IFPI to the court, nor by the witness himself. Why would they intentionally tell the court something that might hinder their case? In a brilliantly ironic case of Web 2.0 and technology undermining a legal case seeking to stop file sharing and technology, the conflict of interest was discovered on the witness’ LinkedIn account. If this entire case doesn’t get chucked out of court, I’m going to have to assume that something is broken in the Danish legal system…
- Mobile Year in Review 2012
- Survival Guide for Engaging Fans and Building a Career in Music [Infographic]
- Intel Developer Forum 2012 Photo Roundup
- Creating One Mobile App That Works On All Devices
- Kid Koala Releases New Album As Mini Gramophone
- How To Build Mobile Apps With MobBase: Intel Developer Forum Keynote Demo
- Mobile Marketing: A Key Part Of An Artist’s Success
- MobBase Offers Artists Free Mobile Web App To Connect With Fans On iPhones, Androids, Tablets & Other Devices
- December 2012 (1)
- November 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (3)
- September 2012 (2)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (2)
- October 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (2)
- January 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (2)
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (4)
- July 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (5)
- May 2010 (6)
- April 2010 (6)
- March 2010 (5)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (7)
- November 2009 (10)
- October 2009 (6)
- September 2009 (5)
- August 2009 (18)
- July 2009 (4)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (5)
- April 2009 (14)
- March 2009 (11)
- February 2009 (30)
- January 2009 (13)
- December 2008 (12)
- November 2008 (15)
- October 2008 (14)
- September 2008 (14)
- August 2008 (12)
- July 2008 (12)
- June 2008 (14)
- May 2008 (8)
- April 2008 (12)
- March 2008 (15)
- February 2008 (11)
- January 2008 (16)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (6)
- October 2007 (14)
- September 2007 (3)
- July 2007 (1)
- activism (12)
- art (10)
- artist/album reviews (75)
- brain (4)
- collaboration (91)
- concert reviews (26)
- contests (5)
- culture (110)
- dance (18)
- DIY (72)
- fans (33)
- film (5)
- future of music (82)
- genres (123)
- interview (28)
- MobBase (40)
- music (350)
- music business (109)
- music history (14)
- music law (10)
- music production (17)
- nerd (14)
- politics (12)
- recording (10)
- remix promotions (31)
- remixing (73)
- social media (16)
- startups (31)
- technology (127)
- tools for musicians (58)
- tra.kz artist spotlight (22)
- video (71)
- web 2.0 (1)
- web 2.0 (17)
- web 3.0 (2)
- website (22)
- Audible Hype
- Crate Kings
- Create Digital Music
- Digipendent
- Digital Music News
- Disco Delicious
- DIYMusicians
- Gen-Y Rock Stars
- Gerd Leonard
- GigaOM
- Hip Hop Distribution
- Hypebot
- I Guess I'm Floating
- Indie Music Tech
- Know The Music Biz
- Mashable
- MixMatchMusic
- MobBase
- Music Nomad
- Music Think Tank
- Pitchfork Media
- Pretty Much Amazing
- RCRD LBL
- Read/Write Web
- RemixComps
- TechCrunch
- The Remix Wizard
- Tra.kz URL Shortener
- Vaksman Law Offices
- WikiAudio
Recent Posts
History
Categories
Bloggers
Blogroll
Copyright © 2007-2014 MixMatchMusic, Ltd. All Rights Reserved
0 Responses to “IFPI – Representing Themselves, Pt. 2”